The "Corona Virus" Pandemic

Medical care & lifestyle choices align with natural processes, including birth and death.

Integration Principle: Joining Eastern, Western and other philosophies of medicine.
golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

The "Corona Virus" Pandemic

Post by golly »

It seems there are several competing ideas about what's going on.

With what?

Well, it's difficult to even find common language on this issue, but for the sake of reducing conflict we might consider using the term "Pandemic".

Different people will refer to the pandemic as different things:
the outbreak of 2019-nCoV (since it's a 2019 mutation of a "novel Corona Virus")
the outbreak of SARS-nCoV-2 (since it's ostensibly a mutation of the SARS-type infection that is also a "novel Corona Virus")
or maybe COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 (since it's specifically ... I am not sure anymore, it seems "corona" and "virus" are indicated twice here? is there even a naming convention?)
the spread of "the" corona virus (since it's the latest corona-type infection to make and then dominate the news)
plandemic (because this pandemic was planned with many social and political engineering efforts in place and ready to go before the outbreak)
info-demic (because there is so much misinformation and/or disinformation spreading about what is taking place)

Current Narratives
as of April 2020

BIOENGINEERED
It seems some element, some infection, whether viral in nature or otherwise (see "... no viral infection" section below) was bioengineered in order to hurt the Chinese population. And perhaps this element did not succeed in being limited to Chinese people and spread to non-oriental populations. The implication is that the Chinese wanted to eliminate dissonants in the population. This is horrific but fairly plausible given the Chinese government's track record and reputation with its own population. (On a perhaps unrelated note the Chinese government is accused recently of rounding up and injecting their Muslim population with sterilization drugs in an attempt to genocide this population under official Chinese authority).

On the other hand, it seems it may have been engineered in Canada according to indy media reporter ZeroHedge:
Last year a mysterious shipment was caught smuggling Coronavirus from Canada. It was traced to Chinese agents working at a Canadian lab. Subsequent investigation by GreatGameIndia linked the agents to Chinese Biological Warfare Program from where the virus is suspected to have leaked causing the Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... aponize-it

There is also a patent on an older "corona virus" from the mid-2010's which became active in 2018. This is incidentally associated with Pirbright Institute, which has been funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Abstract
The present invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene encoding polyproteins comprising a mutation in one or more of non-structural protein(s) (nsp)-10, nsp-14, nsp-15 or nsp-16. The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject.
Image
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10130701B2/en


OVERESTIMATED DEATHS
It seems the WHO and Bill Gates with his 'Event 201' have tried to make it seem as though millions are guaranteed to die without their efforts at vaccination. On top of that, it seems that many deaths are being attributed to "COVID-19" even though they are deaths from other causes: cancer, birth complications, asthmatic conditions and so on.

UNDERESTIMATED DEATHS
China claims to have kept the main virus under control since its outbreak in Wuhan. Yet they have a history of propaganda and lying. There are videos online, which may have been staged, which depict Chinese citizen amateur investigators finding that hospitals are trying to cover up huge amounts of deaths. They went to the hospital and found body bags being hauled away. It has been speculated in social media that these are either fake videos or that the government may be trying to cover up political assassinations and political murders on their own citizenry. They may be targeting dissenters.

THERE IS NO VIRAL INFECTION
There are emerging scientific studies showing that viruses do not cause any illness, per se, but instead are natural bacterial nutrition within everyone's body. That is, the RNA pieces that viruses seem to be are actually just cell ejectamenta that show up during an infection. It could be that germ theory needs some refinement.

VACCINES HAVE MADE PEOPLE SICK
Before the outbreak, it is said that 1.2 million Italian citizens in Lombardy (Northern Italy) were vaccinated for influenza. There was a big commercial push for everyone to get this vaccine. It seems this took place between October 2019 and January 2020, and this is around the time that many cases of "corona virus" affecting Northern Italians with double pneumonia began to be reported. By late February 2020, high numbers of deaths from pneumonia complications are reported and it seems that the world treated Italy as a poster child for how all countries would succumb to "COVID-19".

CHEMTRAILS HAVE MADE PEOPLE SICK
Some social media discusses the possibility of airplanes that regularly dump toxins on the population. The dumps are called chemtrails and they may variously be used for bolstering of electromagnetic signals in the air, drugging the population or other secretive military operations. I can personally attest that when the clouds grow fat and drift down into the atmosphere of the city my allergies and other cold/flu-like symptoms seem to increase or be challenged in some way. This is not the case with mere temperature, humidity or other weather shifts. It has been said that the heavy metal barium, aluminum, strontium 90 and uranium 238 are found in the dumps that descend into the breathable air of major cities. In the USA, according to Congress' Public Law 105-85, it is illegal for us to be tested without our consent so whatever is being done would be illegal. Even if they denied that the results are because of a biological test, it would still be illegal because the clouds contain and involve chemicals:
(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.​
https://www.congress.gov/105/plaws/publ ... publ85.pdf

5G RADIOACTIVE WAVES HAVE MADE PEOPLE SICK
There is a number of concerned scientists who are trying to figure out if 5G has a connection to this "Corona virus" thing, and it seems there is at least on the surface a connection. The reason is that 5G networks (which can operate in the 10s to 100s of times higher frequencies than normal 3G or 4G networks) subject everyone to higher bands of radiation in the millimeter wavelengths. These bands of radiation are close to the weaponized microwaves that the military invented for the purposes of crowd control and mood manipulation. According to researcher Ken Wheeler, who has a deep understanding of magnetism (and light, due to his expertise in photography), the 5G towers are perfectly designed to induce specific moods in the living human physiology; from anger and anxiety to depression.

There is a growing movement of concerned scientists and doctors in epidemiology, cardiology and neurology who have expressed profound concerns with the new levels and types of radiation that emanate from 5G antenna in operation. This level of radiation has been shown to disrupt insects, bird navigation and health and the cardio and nerve systems in test rats. It essentially looks like thermal effects cited by the FDA/CDC/FCC as being harmless are actually the least of the worries; because besides softly microwaving all our organs, 5G levels (especially in the higher 200 GHz ranges) also highly disrupt cell voltage of calcium. This leads to higher disruptions in brain and heart function as well as increased risk for cancerous cell mutation.

We can certainly (and should) talk about how cancer is merely the body's way of protecting itself and other fascinating and good subjects about our body; but the fact is if your body has to protect itself ever more, then something that your body dislikes is happening more and more. I am not sure it's the right time to say we need to "simply adjust" to 5G when this could actually harm humans, plants and other life forms for a gain as minor as gigabyte-per-second data transfers. It's interesting to note that 5G was released in Wuhan during the site of the major outbreak. Perhaps this led to greater complications with a natural (or bioengineered) disease.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

Was "COVID-19" BIOENGINEERED?

Post by golly »

If an agent of some kind were bioengineered, it seems unlikely and illogical from a certain standpoint.
There has been speculation the case involves the improper transfer of intellectual property or biological materials to China. The NML is Canada’s only level-4 facility and one of only a few in North America equipped to handle the world’s deadliest diseases, including Ebola.

However, Kobinger does not believe Xiangguo Qiu was involved in economic espionage.

“The Chinese, do you see the science they’ve been generating in the past 5 years?” he asked, adding most of the research is published publicly.

“The Chinese – they have so many scientists, it’s unreal. What we can do in six months, they can do in a month. There is nothing, nothing, nothing that I can see from my side that they would benefit from us in terms of knowledge, in terms of re-agents,” Kobinger said. “They have better access to pathogens, everything else, the vaccine, therapies, everything.”

...

Until he left the NML three years ago, Qui worked with Kobinger to develop ZMapp, a treatment for Ebola that was successfully used during the outbreak in West Africa in 2014-16. (The World Health Organization declared the latest Ebola outbreak a global health emergency last week.)

Kobinger and Qiu have been recognized for their work, including a Governor General’s Innovation Award in 2018.

Kobinger said he reached out to Xiangguo Qiu by email after hearing the news and she thanked him for his support.

He wishes PHAC could provide a little more information to settle the speculation going on internationally.

“[Qiu’s] body of work is solid. I don’t think it’s going to damage it. But her reputation, I think so, yeah,” Kobinger said in a phone interview.

“If I was in her place, I don’t know if I would ever go back. I would not,” Kobinger said. “So she can take the phone and find a lab anywhere in the world, tomorrow. People may not realize, when you are a top scientist, it’s not hard to move.”

Neither Qiu nor Cheng could be reached for comment.
https://greatgameindia.com/chinese-rese ... adian-lab/

This is from an article by "Great Game India" about trying to track down the concept that this agent was bioengineered. Unfortunately, there is a question of whether Kobinger could be implicated in any knowledge of Qiu's motivations, so it does seem strange to go straight to them to ask if Qiu could possibly have been involved in espionage from 2012 onward.

The full article tracing this (and covered by ZeroHedge in the link above) reads as follows:
The Saudi SARS Sample

On June 13, 2012 a 60-year-old Saudi man was admitted to a private hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a 7-day history of fever, cough, expectoration, and shortness of breath. He had no history of cardiopulmonary or renal disease, was receiving no long-term medications, and did not smoke.

The Canadian Lab

On May 4, 2013, a sample of this Saudi SARS (aka novel Coronavirus) from the very first infected Saudi patient arrived in Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg via Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands who sequenced the virus sample.

Chinese Biological Espionage

In March 2019, in mysterious event a shipment of exceptionally virulent viruses from Canada’s NML ended up in China. The event caused a major scandal with Bio-warfare experts questioning why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China.

Four months later in July 2019, a group of Chinese virologists were forcibly dispatched from the Canadian lab – the only level-4 facility equipped to handle the world’s deadliest diseases where Coronavirus sample from the first Saudi patient was being examined.

Xiangguo Qiu

The scientist who was escorted out of the Canadian lab along with members of her research team is believed to be a Chinese Bio-Warfare agent Xiangguo Qiu.

Dr. Xiangguo Qiu is married to another Chinese scientist Dr. Keding Cheng – the couple is responsible for infiltrating Canada’s NML with many Chinese agents posing as students from a range of Chinese scientific facilities directly tied to China’s Biological Warfare Program.

Dr. Xiangguo Qiu made at least five trips to the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory located only 20 miles away from the Huanan Seafood Market which is the epicenter of the outbreak.

The Canadian investigation is ongoing and questions remain whether previous shipments to China of other viruses or other essential preparations, took place from 2006 to 2018, one way or another.

Frank Plummer Assassination

Meanwhile, in a very strange turn of events, renowned scientist Frank Plummer who received Saudi SARS Coronavirus sample and was working on Coronavirus (HIV) vaccine in the Winnipeg based Canadian lab from where the virus was smuggled by Chinese Biowarfare agents has died in mysterious conditions in Nairobi, Kenya.

Scholars or Spies

The Thousand Talents Plan or Thousand Talents Program was established in 2008 by the central government of China to recognize and recruit leading international experts in scientific research, innovation, and entrepreneurship – in other words to steal western technology.

Weaponizing Biotech

China’s national strategy of military-civil fusion has highlighted biology as a priority, and the People’s Liberation Army could be at the forefront of expanding and exploiting this knowledge. Chinese military’s interest in biology as an emerging domain of warfare is guided by strategists who talk about potential “genetic weapons” and the possibility of a “bloodless victory.”
https://greatgameindia.com/secret-histo ... bioweapon/

In an interesting turn of events, it is reported that "Dr. Francis Boyle Creator Of BioWeapons Act Says Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon" (the actual title of the article quoted from below)
In an exclusive interview given to Geopolitics and Empire, Dr. Boyle discusses the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China and the Biosafety Level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. He believes the virus is potentially lethal and an offensive biological warfare weapon or dual-use biowarfare weapons agent genetically modified with gain of function properties, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up and is now taking drastic measures to contain it. The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.
https://greatgameindia.com/dr-francis-b ... re-weapon/

In the same article (written February 3, 2020 | Last modified on March 23rd, 2020 at 1:51 am) We can also read about a supporter of Dr. Boyle's ideas:
Such concerns have also been raised by J.R. Nyquist, the well known author of the books “Origins of the Fourth World War” and “The Fool and His Enemy,” as well as co-author of “The New Tactics of Global War”
Here we have a plausible theory of the NCoV organism’s travels: first discovered in Saudi Arabia, then studied in Canada from whence it was stolen by a Chinese scientist and brought to Wuhan. Like the statement of Taiwan’s intelligence chief in 2008, the GreatGameIndia story has come under intensive attack. Whatever the truth, the fact of proximity and the unlikelihood of mutation must figure into our calculations.
The "Taiwan intelligence chief" statement in the Nyquist quote link to an article entitled:
Taiwan Intelligence: SARS – A Chinese Bioweapon
October 7, 2008 | Last modified on March 22nd, 2020 at 9:51 pm
https://greatgameindia.com/taiwan-intel ... bioweapon/

The article focuses on the fact that Tsai was made to apologize for harming relations between countries when making the statement.
Tsai stirred up controversy on Monday after telling lawmakers that Taiwan had intelligence linking the SARS virus to research done in Chinese labs.

“The bureau listed it as a biochemical warfare agent. We have certain evidence and we have asked UN experts to look into this and that there are some areas involving China,” Tsai said.

SARS triggered a global health crisis after emerging in China’s southern Guangdong province in November 2002, infecting more than 8,000 people and causing nearly 800 deaths worldwide, including 349 in China and 73 in Taiwan.
The "unlikelihood" words in the Nyquist quote link to an article entitled:
Indian Scientists Discover Coronavirus Engineered With HIV (AIDS) Like Insertions
(February 1, 2020 | Last modified on April 19th, 2020 at 1:28 am)
https://greatgameindia.com/indian-scien ... nsertions/

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

Was "COVID-19" tested/released in the USA in November 2019?

Post by golly »

My experience with illness during the pandemic
The major outbreak in the USA seems to have "begun" (in official news reports) in late February 2020. This was around the time that I was getting ready to go traveling to Amsterdam and Paris to see family. By the time the flight rolled around (March 5th) I was feeling really under the weather from some kind of post-viral "syndrome" (as diagnosed by an Urgent Care doctor in Flagstaff, AZ). It should be noted that "Urgent Care" type facilities in Arizona do not actually equate to emergency facilities. They are used by many people for just getting a check up and they take people with or without insurance and offer privatized medical plans. After seeing the doctor there, I had been prescribed a steroid and an antibiotic to combat any kind of return infection or new infection due to my vulnerable state. I got the medicines because they made me feel safer while traveling in the middle of a worldwide viral scare that was said to be deadly for even young people.

My illness seemed to start for me after coming back from Minnesota and feeling fine. My friend from Minnesota visited me and we went climbing at a public rock climbing facility in the university area of downtown Flagstaff. We had a good time but it was a bit rainy that day and we were both slightly underdressed for it. It felt fine, though, because we were on our rush from exercising and having a good time. Yet by the evening, I felt more tired than usual and slightly sore in the throat. I was not too bothered by this because I knew we had experienced lots of indoor allergies and disruptive breathing issues in Flagstaff due to something. Possibly more allergies from outside or possibly just colds coming and going despite our good health.

But after a few days I still felt quite tired and I exhibited flu symptoms. I was achy, exhausted and shivery. I felt as though I had a fever but I couldn't be sure until one evening that it really hit me. For a full day I was feverish, headachy, snotty and the following evening I had a fever again. I sweat it out and then I felt much better and it seemed to be gone. But a week passed and I was still exhausted, and my throat felt raw; indeed my right tonsil looked as though someone had peeled it open and exposed a raw bloody mess. As my trip to Europe approached and news reports increased of an epidemic I told my family I was hesitant to come and travel, but they said to hold off on a decision until the day before to give me the most time to heal. When I felt almost worse (from nausea, headache and exhaustion) the day before travel than the day I "recovered" after the fever nights, I decided to tell them I wasn't coming. But due to the time difference they had already assumed I didn't say no and sent messages saying, "See you soon!"

I started to think maybe I should just go anyway because if everyone was getting sick, I wasn't sure the next time I could see my European family. And in any case, it was for my mother's birthday and I really wanted to see everyone. It had been so long. The entire journey to Europe, I regretted it. For hours I went from airplane to airport layover to the next on a pretty hard schedule I wasn't used to. I remember spending about five hours in Dallas just trying to drink water and feel like I wasn't going to pass out from tiredness. By the time I got to the hotel in Amsterdam they had arranged for me, I was trembling and beat and my throat felt terrible. I cried. There was no way I was going to make it on a train to Paris early the next day. I just wanted one full night's sleep after such gruelling rides. I called a doctor to the hotel and they prescribed a different antibiotic called Amoxocillin because the first one he said my body was rejecting.

After my family accepted the fact that I was unable to enjoy time with them normally, they allowed me to mostly rest, drink lots of broth and work my way back up to solid foods. The antibiotic killed my gut and when I got through the prescription a few days before I was to leave, I started to rebuild on the wonderful foods that my family lovingly provided. The other details of my bizarre (and somewhat existential) experience in bed in Amsterdam for 10 days (as the rattling bikes, joyous voices and laughter on the canal gradually receded to near empty tour boats, practically abandoned streets and finally little more than tweeting birds) need not be explored in this post, but I was relieved to have "successfully" visited with my family and then begin my trip home through a surreal environment of panic, "shelter in place" and "keep your distance" announcements, along with antibacterial sprays in the filtered air of the airplanes.

Symptoms of "COVID-19"
Allegedly, the symptoms of the thing that keeps getting called COVID-19 (and not the false deaths attributed to it) include something like this narrative:
1. You get something like a cold or flu, with a headache, breathing issues or a change in taste/smell
2. You may get a headache and a dry cough as the infection enters the spleen
3. Your body recognizes an issue and you get a fever
4. Mostly, you'll just recover from this fever and the agent is gone
5. Your immune system sees some bacteria where it doesn't belong in the lungs
6. Due to any given immune system's status, you will either expel the issue with coughing or your immune system goes into overdrive and begins attacking your own lungs
7. Due to bad oxygen levels, you have difficulty feeling you have enough oxygen, your cough may worsen
8. Then there is some test of how you treat yourself which becomes about life and death.

Some heal naturally. Some go to the hospital to be given IVs and ventilator treatment. Hopefully the ventilator treatment doesn't given you a mismatch with your oxygen levels, or your brain doesn't shut down and stop giving you the ability to control your breathing, as apparently reported in some cases.

Given all this, perhaps my alleged post-viral syndrome was in fact the same infection that is being called COVID-19. But my immune system did not act too imbalanced, and so it lasted a couple months but stretched out the issue safely instead of just tearing my own lungs apart. I never had much of a cough from November to now, and if I did cough I felt it was the kind you get when you are just hot or your oxygen feels "off" rather than because of an acute lung issue. (Or because you're wearing a mask to protect the older population and your local air gets "humid" and choking because of the danged mask itself). I write about this because I want to write about the possibility that the illness people were getting in November of 2019 (last year) or the one people were getting early 2020 may have not been related to COVID. But maybe they were.


A Planned November 2019 Pre-infection?
I was surprised that my illness lasted for almost two months. But as I talked with others the atmosphere of a mass panic settled into a kind of grind and it gradually dawned on many of us that we had been sick four months earlier from around Thanksgiving (late November) 2019 through December with a tenacious cold.

Normally I get sick for a week (or two at most) with any given cold or flu. Some recent years I have been eating so healthfully (largely of fruits and veggies and less acidic-making foods) that I don't get sick at all. So it took me by surprise that I had something even as minor as the sniffles for over a month. When it went away, I quickly forgot about it, and I forgot hard. I didn't even think of it when the "corona" panic first started spreading from China and Italy to elsewhere at the start of the new year. But it turns out I wasn't the only one.

It seems everyone I talked to agreed 50% of the population had had a bad cold of some kind that lasted several weeks longer than normal. The news was talking about vaping causing a disease around the same time, which seemed rather unlikely given the large amounts of testing that had gone into vaping devices that were meant to be healthier alternatives to cigarettes. It is possible that it really was some odd vaping issue, but allow me to build my case.

It seems that it's possible that the USA was well aware of the bioengineering being done by Canada and China, and even anticipated something bad when Bill Gates started gearing up with his allies to "provide for" a possible (deliberately induced?) pandemic in 2020. Perhaps some in American government were aware of this, did what they could to inoculate the public with a less powerful version of the infection early and therefore any plan China had to deliberately infect the world and harm its economies was subverted. Meanwhile, it would be allowed to appear unsuspected so the USA could watch the behavior of other countries and see how they reacted well or poorly. Bill Gates, with his depopulation agenda, would eventually be left to the wayside. And his ally (which he personally funds) the WHO would be exposed for their complicity or at least defunded (as Trump recently threatened).

Believing this would require us to have a story about our government that seems rather fanciful and Hollywood in nature; is there truly some kind of "power struggle" between secret Good Hats and secret Bad Hats in the government? Why wouldn't good operate in open and in public so that light could be shone upon the bad agents? Only if there is a need for the good to spy on them and act quickly against bad plans.

It was not bio-engineered ... maybe?
It could also be that the disease presented itself in a few forms naturally; that is, one form appeared as a minor (but sticky) cold in November, then again as a highly lung-oriented infection in January in China. But it just so happens they appeared at the same time because that is the "level" that disease (and lack of health) achieved in this era. Crystals are known to communicate instantaneously around the world. Perhaps mutations can also occur in this fashion.

It is also possible that the level of toxins in our air and water (however those got there) have contributed to a new "stickiness" to germs (and/or germ warfare, just sayin') that will give us longer-lasting health issues with simple illnesses. I find this does not quite add up, however, because I feel I have been paying close attention to health and it seems that even people who are "cleaning up their act" and exposed to far fewer toxins than before have suffered from these newer diseases in ways that belie the features of the disease, not merely the features of the diseased.

This has been an argument for why "increases in radiation" (i.e.; radar, wi-fi, etc.) increasingly make the world exposed to mass illnesses all at once, rather than following the pattern of a specific germ contagion. It has been part of the fuel behind the idea that 5G inadvertently "caused corona" because of the recent 5G tests that are harbingers of the widescale implementation coming allegedly very soon this year.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

Was "COVID-19" BIOENGINEERED?

Post by golly »

From https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/0 ... 2019-ncov/
[My bolds below]
Logistical and Technical Exploration into the Origins of the Wuhan Strain of Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Posted on January 31, 2020 by harvard2thebighouse

An accessible and comprehensive YouTube summary of the report below by a Professor of Neurobiology at the University of Pittsburgh’s Medical School is available here: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlplnH3VYyc]. And you can read our takedown of Nature magazine’s recent article claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab here.
As far back as 2015, Chinese labs were reported to have been involved with dual-use gain-of-function research, mixing and matching viral genomes in the lab, research that accelerated after the Chinese military made a massive push to expand their biotechnological capabilities. And it should be noted that in 2018, the esteemed scientific journal Nature – which has published numerous articles speciously claiming this virus is definitely natural – was revealed to have buckled to censorship demands from the Chinese government, killing over 1,000 articles to placate their Chinese partners.
– In 2002, Stony Brook first assembled a DNA virus from scratch, building a polio-virus, and providing proof-of-concept for the creation, alteration, and manipulation of DNA-virus genomes. Two years prior, a separate team had already built [a] simpler RNA-virus from scratch – choosing to engineer a coronavirus from the ground up, and even swapping out its vital spike-protein genes to make it more infectious. And a generation earlier, artificially enhancing selection by intentionally infecting countless series of lab animals with different viruses is understood to have created the H1N1 Swine Flu. Its Franken-genome has a mysterious untraceable genetic parentage and a “clear unnatural origin,” appearing to be the product of “sequential passage in an animal reservoir” which was determined by its vast genetic distance from any extant strain of flu, just like COVID-19 which also appears so distant from any related coronavirus that it’s been placed in its own clade, an isolated branch way out on its own in the viral family tree – meaning it’s the lone example of its kind, and doesn’t clump together with all the other known coronaviruses. Although both the H1N1 Swine Flu and COVID-19 sprung into existence spontaneously, and were distant off-shoots of any other known strain of flu – so why is there a scientific consensus that the former leaked out of a lab, while many insist the latter is entirely natural?
In the YouTube video mentioned above, in case the link breaks, this description helps us understand the argument that it's ridiculous to say we cannot have made an artificial bioagent or bioweapon. Especially since we have apparently been doing so for many years, and specifically corona strains.
PNAS paper 2002 showing techniques to use cDNA to generate RNA viruses:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC25860/
Commentary on above:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC33981/

A few papers showing how fun it is to collect bat viruses in the wild:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389864/ (This one uses the ACE2 receptor?!)

A nice article about the Gain-of-Function Debate, viruses as weapons:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542197/

A few papers to start with regarding the making of our own chimeric bat coronaviruses:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006927/

The paper with a culture prep to study viruses and lung epithelium interactions:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744394/

A few papers regarding the crystallography of coronaviruses:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338876/

A couple coronavirus reviews:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465284/

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

VIRUSES DO NOT CAUSE ILLNESS (AND/OR DON'T EXIST)

Post by golly »

A number of doctors are coming out with the idea mentioned earlier that viruses are misidentified as the cause of infection rather than the result of infection. That is, if I'm following this correctly (and the idea is still relatively new for me) inert RNA chunks which are falsely associated with a viral attack on our own cells' structure/program can be attributed to damaged cell pieces rejected by the host's body and cells. The characteristics of the damage inspire treatments to stop the evidence of the cell protecting itself. It sounds as though this theory is saying we are looking at a patient's scraped knee and each time the body works to heal the damage, we think the scab is evidence of illness and we obsessively peel it off.

I agree with the principle that wherever it is possible, we should be encouraging the body's own healing. But we should definitely continue to try to be better at diagnosis.

POLIO
In the case of polio, for example, there are a number of polio-like conditions that are not caused by any sort of virus. As found here:
Nonpolio causes of polio-like paralytic syndromes
by Gear JH.

Abstract
In a study of patients with suspected poliomyelitis, but from whom poliovirus was not isolated, a variety of causes of the paralysis was found. Injury of the spinal column sometimes followed by periostitis or osteomyelitis was relatively common. Exotic causes included paralysis due to snake bite, spider bite, scorpion sting, and tick bite and schistosomiasis involving the spinal cord. Chemical poisons, such as arsenic, triorthocresyl phosphate, and organophosphorus insecticides, were responsible for paralysis affecting groups of people. Paralysis in individual patients with porphyria followed the administration of anesthesia and certain drugs. Normal clinicopathologic findings in hospital nurses with Iceland disease suggested a psychological component. The Guillain-Barré syndrome in some patients resulted from virus infection of the nerve tissue, in others it was related to a hyperreactive autoallergic state. Enterovirus infections, especially coxsackieviruses A9 and A23 (echovirus 9) and group B coxsackieviruses, frequently caused meningoencephalitis often associated with transient paralysis. Coxsackievirus A7 infection occasionally resulted in permanent paralysis. Clearly it is important to maintain surveillance of these infections.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6740077

Note that Gear JH does not endorse any idea that "poliovirus" does not even exist; it is only that there are alternative conditions that match "poliovirus" illnesses; could it be eventually all such illnesses can be attributed to something else? In that case, what would be the "poliovirus"?

However, in this semi-(in)famous graph in pro/con vaccination discussions, there is a surprising correlation in the use of DDT pesticides and the increase in alleged "polio" cases:

Image
Source: https://vactruth.com/2012/06/03/7-trivi ... out-polio/
Via: https://worldhealth.net/forum/topic/673/
Via: Google's suggested search for "polio and pesticide exposure"

HIV/AIDS
As far as I understand it, it has already been established that HIV appears to be an inconsistently diagnosed "issue" rather than an actual virus; it is caused by any variety of immune-system weakening behavior sets including drug use, exhaustion/stress, poor nourishment and/or weakening of organs due to exhaustion/mistreatment.

On top of that, according to this theory, AIDS is apparently little (if not nothing) more than the symptoms of an immune-system attacking drug called ATZ. ATZ is prescribed to people diagnosed with a non-existent virus called "HIV", and its effect is to deliberately attack and suppress the body's own immune system. This would essentially worsen any condition causing us to diagnose someone with "HIV" in the first place and help (or aid, if you will) in killing them off by attacking the body at its weakest point. If this is true, then it would stand to reason that all conditions diagnosed as HIV can be healed and cured by simply improving the body's nutrition and health and diminishing stresses. And of course, immediately quit taking anything like ATZ.

Oddly, there is a "cross over" between the HIV story and the COVID-19 story, in at least a couple places. According to this article by researchers of the contagion, pieces of the COVID-19 test results seem to resemble certain HIV test results:
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 0.927871v1

However, the article was withdrawn and it is being accused of being poor and irresponsible science as well as dangerous misinformation.
This paper has been withdrawn by its authors. They intend to revise it in response to comments received from the research community on their technical approach and their interpretation of the results. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... qus_thread

I don't suspect any foul play or "cover up" going on here, since this is a minor story among those discussing the bioweapon angle. But since I'm writing on the "viruses aren't a problem" topic, it could be they simply don't know how to identify HIV either.

So just to start off, the idea that there are loads of "deadly viruses" killing off the population may be a confusion about what's truly happening. Let's explore this further.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

Examining Official Refutations of the 'Bioengineered' Theory

Post by golly »

According to a Wikipedia article entitled: Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic
[my bolds]
It has been repeatedly claimed that the virus was deliberately created by humans.

Nature Medicine published an article arguing against the conspiracy theory that the virus was created artificially. The high-affinity binding of its peplomers to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was shown to be "most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise".[155] In case of genetic manipulation, one of the several reverse-genetic systems for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used, while the genetic data irrefutably showed that the virus is not derived from a previously used virus template.[155] The overall molecular structure of the virus was found to be distinct from the known coronaviruses and most closely resembles that of viruses of bats and pangolins that were little studied and never known to harm humans.[156]

In February 2020, the Financial Times quoted virus expert and global co-lead coronavirus investigator Trevor Bedford: "There is no evidence whatsoever of genetic engineering that we can find", and "The evidence we have is that the mutations [in the virus] are completely consistent with natural evolution".[157] Bedford further explained, "The most likely scenario, based on genetic analysis, was that the virus was transmitted by a bat to another mammal between 20–70 years ago. This intermediary animal—not yet identified—passed it on to its first human host in the city of Wuhan in late November or early December 2019".[157]

On February 19, 2020, The Lancet published a letter of a group of scientists condemning "conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin".[158]
According to the cited article from Nature Medicine, we have the quote: "most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise" which is not an absolute statement. Yet science is eager to call alternative explanations from leading articles "pseudo-science" or "conspiracy theory". The trouble with trying to officially control a narrative that fights the rich diversity of opinion (around even sad subjects like disease) is that it feels it must acknowledge the existence of alternative opinion and at the same time berate and cajole people away from considering it.

The comment quoted out of Financial Times that "There is no evidence whatsoever of genetic engineering that we can find" seems peculiar because it has already been made clear to me that because gain-of-function bioagents exist it would automatically set up the possibility that bioagents can be manufactured or occur naturally. It is disingenuous to report that there is no evidence of genetic engineering of bioagents. And it is especially disingenuous to report that no evidence of genetic tampering of Corona viruses exists anywhere (since you can simply use the Internet for an hour to find studies about gain-of-function uses of Corona varitey viruses), unless you are implying that Corona viruses do not exist. Shall we assume that Wikipedia has taken the quote out of context? Or should we assume that the article it links to is bogus?

So even the most conservative interpretation of this propaganda article on Wikipedia appears to contradict itself.

The last quote, from The Lancet is not even scientific evidence. It's just a condemnation of seeking alternative explanations, which is already implicit in the article. Interesting that Wikipedia accepts it as contributing to their argument, as it makes the argument look extremely weak indeed.

Many people will reference Wikipedia as an authority on the subject, without acknowledging the tacit supremacist culture of those presenting the information.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

1977-1978 Flu Epidemic tied to Gain-Of-Function Research

Post by golly »

ABSTRACT

The 1977-1978 influenza epidemic was probably not a natural event, as the genetic sequence of the virus was nearly identical to the sequences of decades-old strains. While there are several hypotheses that could explain its origin, the possibility that the 1977 epidemic resulted from a laboratory accident has recently gained popularity in discussions about the biosafety risks of gain-of-function (GOF) influenza virus research, as an argument for why this research should not be performed. There is now a moratorium in the United States on funding GOF research while the benefits and risks, including the potential for accident, are analyzed. Given the importance of this historical epidemic to ongoing policy debates, we revisit the evidence that the 1977 epidemic was not natural and examine three potential origins: a laboratory accident, a live-vaccine trial escape, or deliberate release as a biological weapon. Based on available evidence, the 1977 strain was indeed too closely matched to decades-old strains to likely be a natural occurrence. While the origin of the outbreak cannot be conclusively determined without additional evidence, there are very plausible alternatives to the laboratory accident hypothesis, diminishing the relevance of the 1977 experience to the modern GOF debate.
- The Reemergent 1977 H1N1 Strain and the Gain-of-Function Debate by Michelle Rozo, Gigi Kwik Gronvall
https://mbio.asm.org/content/6/4/e01013-15

This is an abstract from an article linked in the Big House article, in reference to their writing:
Although both the H1N1 Swine Flu and COVID-19 sprung into existence spontaneously, and were distant off-shoots of any other known strain of flu, [w]hy is there a scientific consensus that the former leaked out of a lab, while many insist the latter is entirely natural? [...T]his strain of H1N1 became the poster-child for a moratorium against gain-of-function research – experimentation that seeks to increase a pathogen’s virulence, creating a more effective double-edged sword to counter and learn from. A ban that was in place for years, but was recently lifted by the American government. In the case of H1N1, it wasn’t a question of if it’d escaped from a research laboratory, only whether it’d been designed as part of a weapons system, or been part of a vaccine trial.
Why indeed, would there be an effort to completely bury the recent virus discussion in articles declaring it is absolutely not bioengineered in any way (which is implicit in the claim that it developed "naturally")? Why?

Are there concerns that because we don't know, we would induce panic by spreading the information before us to try to understand it? I think that while people are concerned that they don't know what this "COVID-19" narrative is leading to, it is better to consider all the information rather than asking for Wikipedia article editors (who have built up a homogenous culture against valid critiques) to filter information for me.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

More on the alleged unlikelihood of Gain-Of-Function design

Post by golly »

According to the article The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2
Kristian G. Andersen, Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes, and Robert F. Garry
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095063/
(Published in Nature Medicine 2020 Mar 17 : 1–3.)
While the analyses [...] suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may bind human ACE2 with high affinity
(It's effectively "catchy" in people.)
... computational analyses predict that the interaction is not ideal
"Ideal" being defined by a study credited to Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus (Published online in Journal of Virology 2020 Mar 17. Prepublished online 2020 Jan 29.) not necessarily being defined by someone who can manipulate RNA and DNA in a lab setting to create a plausible deniability or even a particular ill effect on society.
and that the RBD sequence is different from those shown in SARS-CoV to be optimal for receptor binding. Thus, the high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation.
Their conclusion is just as equally "strong evidence" that SARS-CoV-2 is the product of extremely purposeful manipulation.

Unless we wish to discount the possibility that humans are competent in their scientific acuity.

I don't know how we can have it both ways. To me it seems either humans are not actually capable of achieving Gain-Of-Function modifications or they are. It does require what we would consider a human morality to prevent our skills from being used for evil, but morality is not in discussion in any of these articles. And that's a pretty big problem, considering we are dealing with highly influential subject matter.

Are all humans technically capable of designing Gain-Of-Function offshoots of existing pathogens? No.
Are some? Yes!

Are all humans fully resisting tendencies to harm others where personal gain and low risk of personal harm is the stake? Also no.
Are some resisting harmful tendencies well? Also yes! Perhaps even most. Perhaps they are resisting to the best of their ability.

Without acknowledging the ability for people to physically manipulate pathogens, these articles strike a tone of moral and social ignorance.


What Animal Could Have Been Used To Test COVID-19?

As quoted in the Big House article [my bolds]:
Tinkering with viral genomes is not anything new, but is not something that has ever been fully embraced by the scientific community at large. About a decade ago, two separate research teams successful tweaked the genome of the H5N1 Bird Flu in just two spots and then passed it through ferrets until it became both airborne and pathogenic to mammals, creating a virus that “could make the deadly 1918 pandemic look like a pesky cold.” This involved selecting for a mutation that allowed the virus to access a receptor that’s found in ferret lungs, and was alarming enough that the research was urged to be published without revealing the specific methods involved and data collected – however it appears that only the most technical details were left out, and most of the research is freely available. And studies examining COVID-19’s infectivity in ferrets found that it spreads readily among them, and also appears airborne in that animal model, lending support to the idea that ferrets were used for serial passage. Further support for possibility that serial passage through lab animals played a role in the creation of COVID-19 comes from an April 2020 pre-print, which found that coronaviruses that target the ACE2 receptor bind with ferrets cells more tightly than any other species except the tree shrew, which only scored about 2% higher. Tree shrews have also been used for serial viral passage, and were promoted in a 2018 paper out of China as a preferable host for laboratory serial passage since they’re cheaper, smaller, easier to handle, and closer to humans evolutionarily and physiologically than ferrets. Pangolins however, formed a much weaker bond than either, and were clustered way down on the list along with a handful of other much more unlikely intermediate animal hosts.
This might also explain why, if a "COVID-19" infectious agent was bioengineered, it would not necessarily need to be refined to be more effective in humans. It is already effective enough in ferrets and tree shrews, as is common practice to assess something with a "basic" ACE2 receptivity.

We should study and understand this information if we would like to discuss it on a serious level. Even if we disagree with virology (or even its assumptions) it is the leading official religion of the dominant (read: heavily sponsored) stream of COVID-19 information.

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

The Pandemic of False Positives?

Post by golly »

The Pandemic of False Positives

There are strange events happening around the tests being marked "positive" for the "Corona virus". Some of it can be found on Reddit under the topic Where’s the “uptick”? Data taken from the CDC website shows decrease in hospitalizations. Could it be false positive testing as Elon Musk posted? ( https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... c_website/ )
RT-pcr primers for covid-19 have been known to have an extremely low specificity and selectivity. The first round of primers had a false positive rate of +80%. Everyone in media lost their mind and didn’t listen to scientist saying this, only the ones who said stay home and were later seen protesting 6 weeks later.

Currently the false positive rate is down to 50-60%, but every time we increase the testing sample size, the number climbs back to 80%.

“However, the sensitivity of RT-PCR is insufficient, ranging from 50 to 62%”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172864/

Other papers initially saying an 80% false positive rate were redacted by the WHO and CDC, (even though several labs confirmed similar findings) who should have no authority in NCBIs publications...
- DrPeanutbutter
Really good article explaining RT-PCR and how it was never meant to be used for anything but research.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-th ... t-a-virus/
- TheSwindle

As redditors attempt to discover what this means, it seems the theme is an uptick in false positives for people who aren't sick from COVID (if at all) are being diagnosed with COVID. So it skews the statistics.

However, if you read the latter article, it actually seems to point out that more false negatives would appear due to the lack of sensitivity for the test agents. Because of the unreliability, many are concluding that the tests are meant to return more positives than negatives, no matter the actual state of the people being tested.

Since Arizona is presently being punished with mandatory masks for having many businesses open up too soon (both the opening and the mandate can be pinned on the former Cold Stone ice cream executive, who they now call the Mayor), it seems the increase in false positives is a way to get people to realize opening the State too early was a mistake of some kind.

At least on the surface.

There are also first-hand reports circulating (which I will investigate next) that point out nurses and pharmacy customers are being given tests they never completed. The tests arrive as "positive" for COVID. How much of this would be explained by corrupt tests and how much would be explained by corrupt systems (and the corrupt perpetuaters of the corrupt systems)?

golly
Site Admin
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:14 am
Location: Hohokam / Piipaash / Apache / O'odham / Pueblo / Mexico / Arizona

Gender

Skin

Sexuality

Belief

Political

Re: The "Corona Virus" Pandemic

Post by golly »

Further interesting analysis by axolotl_peyotl original poster of: Over 95% of UK “Covid19” Deaths Had Pre-existing Condition: These diseases may be the actual cause of death, with Covid19 playing no direct role at all. Further, the PCR test for coronavirus returns FALSE POSITIVES in up to 80% of cases, so the majority may never have even had the virus.
(https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... eexisting/)

Quote (my paragraph spacing and square brackets) :
Over 95% of “COVID Deaths” recorded in England and Wales had potentially serious comorbidities, according to statistics released by NHS England.

The latest figures make for pretty stark reading. Or, rather, they would make for stark reading…if they didn’t follow the exact same pattern already shown in other nations around the world. You can read the full report here. We’re going to focus on the comorbidity stats. Here are the number of deaths where Covid19 was listed as the only cause, split by age:

Ages 0-19: 3
Ages 20-39: 32
Ages 40-59: 255
Ages 60-79: 551
Ages 80+: 477

These are across all of England and Wales since the beginning of the “pandemic”. Simply put: Of the 27045 [27 thousand] deaths with Covid19 in English hospitals (up to June 3rd), only 1318 [thirteen hundred and eighteen] had no pre-existing conditions. That’s less than 5%.

This mirrors, almost exactly, the statistics reported in Italy back in March. Christopher Bowyer has made some great graphs for the figures at Hector Drummond Magazine, none more impactful than this. Those big green bars are all the people who died “with” Covid19 AND some other serious disease. The little yellow bars are the people who died with Covid19 and nothing else.

In fact, the 25,727 other cases were listed as having over 42,000 comorbidities. That’s almost 2 each (the report itself points out that many patients had multiple conditions). This, again, aligns completely with the Italian figures which said over 80% of fatalities had at least 2 comorbidities. What are these comorbidities? We don’t know. Not entirely specifically. The report lists ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, asthma and dementia among others. But it also lists nearly 19,000 “other” conditions, presumably including liver failure, emphysema, AIDS, ALL forms of cancers and literally potentially thousands of other diseases.

Implicit in this is the possibility that these diseases were the actual cause of death, and that Covid19 played no direct role at all. Further, the PCR test for coronavirus can return false positives in up to 80% of cases, so it’s entirely possible the majority of these deaths never even had the virus. This isn’t breaking news. We have covered this numerous times. No matter how you switch them around the Covid numbers, as they currently stand, will never add up.

Post Reply